Back to homeCompany research · Sunrun
A source-based index of state actions involving Sunrun, with the procedural status of each matter kept separate and direct links to the government record.
An investigation is not a finding of wrongdoing. Lawsuit allegations are not court findings. A settlement can resolve disputed claims without an admission of wrongdoing. This page labels each action separately and does not treat them as one case.
The April 2026 announcement says Texas issued Civil Investigative Demands to Sunrun and other companies while examining possible misrepresentations involving electric-bill savings, system performance, equipment, company terms and policies, warranties, service plans, marketing materials, and contracts. An investigation is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Source dated April 3, 2026View the Texas solar resource page →
Open official source ↗A federal court order summarizes a Florida homeowner's allegations that Sunrun would not remove panels for a roof replacement unless she signed a new agreement and paid more than $8,000, and that Sunrun later demanded about $35,000 to buy out the contract. The case later proceeded toward arbitration and the federal docket reported a settlement in April 2026. The allegations were not findings of wrongdoing.
Source dated October 30, 2025View the Florida solar resource page →
Open official source ↗Arizona's court-approved agreement resolves allegations concerning solar sales practices and includes consumer-relief and complaint-handling requirements. Sunrun and Vivint Solar denied the allegations, and the agreement is not an admission of wrongdoing.
Source dated May 22, 2025View the Arizona solar resource page →
Open official source ↗Connecticut alleges unlawful residential-solar sales conduct involving contracts, signatures, permits, and non-functioning systems. The allegations remain allegations unless established through the court process.
Source dated July 19, 2024View the Connecticut solar resource page →
Open official source ↗A California homeowner says Sunrun roof-preparation work led to water intrusion before panels were installed. His Sunrun claims remain in Los Angeles Superior Court while a Sept. 16 tentative ruling would send his separate Tesla claims to arbitration.
Read the Connecticut Attorney General lawsuit summary and allegations →
Arizona Attorney General consumer settlement information ↗
Arizona stipulated consent agreement ↗
This page is an index of documented public actions, not a claim score or legal assessment. Read the methodology and corrections policy.